KATHMANDU: A writ petition requesting legal action against Lilaballabh Adhikari, a member of the provincial legislature and the former minister of Koshi Province's internal affairs and legislation, has been denied by the Supreme Court administration. On November 10, Adhikari, a leader of the CPN-UML, was arrested by police on suspicion of people trafficking.

Senior attorney Dinesh Tripathi filed the petition, which contested the Kathmandu District Attorney's Office's choice to drop Adhikari's charges. On procedural grounds, however, Supreme Court Registrar Bhadrakali Pokharel rejected the plea, claiming that such cases are outside the jurisdiction of the courts.

Following his suspected involvement with a human trafficking operation that gave three young men phony identities in order to fly to Japan, Adhikari found himself at the center of controversy. Suspecting illegal entrance, Adhikari and the three were deported by Japanese immigration authorities on October 30. The youths were arrested when they returned to Nepal, and Adhikari used his position as a minister to evade an instant investigation.

The group had traveled to Japan in the guise of participating in the Arts Council Tokyo-organized "Culture at Heart" program in Tokyo, which ran from October 29 to November 3. Adhikari is suspected by authorities of working with the young people to use the occasion as a front for human trafficking.

Adhikari admitted that he was impacted by a trafficking network, but he denied being aware of its illicit intent until he got to Hong Kong. Since they think he only raised the matter to Nepali authorities after Japanese immigration denied him entry, they are dubious of this claim.

In reaction to public uproar, Adhikari resigned as minister at the beginning of November. The episode has garnered a lot of attention and exposed the abuse of power by public officials and the shortcomings in government accountability.

On November 25, the Kathmandu District Attorney's Office stated that there was not enough evidence to press charges against Adhikari. The petition, which asked for judicial intervention to reverse the prosecutor's judgment and hold Adhikari accountable, was sparked by this ruling.

Registrar Pokharel countered that Article 158(2) of the Constitution safeguarded the Attorney General's decision to withdraw charges, shielding such decisions from judicial review. The termination highlighted the division of powers under the prosecutor's discretion.

The Supreme Court administration's ruling was contested by petitioner Tripathi, who claimed that it violated judicial accountability and was based on antiquated legal thinking. He said that the ruling showed institutional prejudice and that courts have stepped in before in such circumstances.

Tripathi has promised to appeal the registrar's decision in cases involving well-known people, arguing that to solve systemic problems and enforce responsibility, the court must step in.

Given that he allegedly helped the young people fly to Japan while serving as minister, Adhikari's alleged activities have sparked concerns about the abuse of government power. His political career as well as the credibility of the legal system have been harmed by the charges.

Even though he resigned and was deported, the case serves as a reminder of how difficult it may be to bring charges against influential people. Reforms have been demanded by critics in order to improve monitoring and stop officials from abusing their positions for illegal or personal benefit.

Discussions over the court's role in holding political players accountable have been reignited by the occurrence. The importance of impartial legal processes and judicial independence in maintaining public trust in the government and the rule of law is emphasized by observers.