Many artists have an unstable time to release artwork online. The AI ​​image generator becomes better cheap to repeat the wider and wider style. There are safeguards against AI training, such as Glaze, a tool that adds a small amount of human-imperceptible noise to an image to prevent the image generator from copying the artist's style. But they don't offer a permanent solution at a time when tech companies seem determined to chase profits by building increasingly sophisticated AI models that increasingly threaten to threaten artists' brands and replace them in the marketplace. In a high-profile example, Ansel Adams' estate last month condemned AdAdobe for selling artificial intelligence images that stole the famous photographer's style, according to the Smithsonian Institution. Adobe responded quickly and removed the AI ​​copycat. But it's not just well-known artists who are at risk of having their work stolen. It can also be difficult for lesser-known artists to prove that their work is referenced by an AI model. In this largely lawless world, every image uploaded can cause an artist to go bankrupt, potentially reducing the demand for their work every time they advertise a new piece online. Not surprisingly, artists are increasingly defensive or avoiding these risks to protecting these AI. When a technology company updated its expression product, when Meta suddenly announced that it was trained in billions of billions last December, the artist Crazy tested the new protection landscape. This is the reason why it is considered among those who provide limited AI protection measures today, the glass project recently reported that free tool demand has increased.

Its purpose is to help prevent imitation of style or even married AI models. Ben Zhao, a professor at the University of Chicago who created the tools, told Ars that the backlog of approving a "skyrocketing" number of access requests is "horrendous." development, the "explosion of demand" in June may continue. For the foreseeable future, this means that artists seeking protection from artificial intelligence will have to wait. Even if Zhao's team had done nothing but approve requests for WebGlaze, the invitation-only online version of Glaze, "we still could have won," Zhao said. He warned the X artists to be prepared for delays.

Artists are having a harder time, and as demand for Glaze grows, the tool has also come under fire from security researchers who claim that Glaze's protections are not only possible, but easy to bypass. For security researchers and some artists, the attack raises questions about whether Glaze can really protect artists in this difficult era. But for the thousands of artists who have joined the Glaze queue, the long-term future looks so bleak that any promise to prevent copycats seems worth the wait. Attacks on cracked glaze are controversial

Millions of people have downloaded Glaze, and many artists have waited weeks or even months to get access to WebGlaze, mostly by submitting invitation requests on social media. The Glaze project reviews each request to verify that each user is human and to ensure that bad actors aren't abusing the tools, so this process can take some time. The team is currently working hard to approve hundreds of requests every day, direct reports on Instagram and Twitter, and submitted to the recipient's order and demands the artists to attend to be patient with a long delay. Since these platforms are not too easy to sort messages, any artist who follows the demand will encounter the back of the line, as their news will move to the top of the income box and the Zhao Team Free -Voluniceer continues to confirm the bottom. demand. "This is clearly a problem," Zhao wrote on X, while discouraging artists from submitting any further work unless they have already received an invitation. "We may need to change the way we invite and rethink the future of WebGlaze to make it sustainable enough to support a large and growing user base."

Interest in glazes can also grow due to word of mouth. Reid Southen is a freelance concept artist who designs major motion pictures and supports all artists to use Glaze. Reed told Ars that WebGlaze is especially "good" because it's "free for people who don't have the GPU power to run the program on their home computers."